<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Andreas Baumhof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog</link>
	<description>malware research, IT Security and life in general :-)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wow what a certificate (verified.cm) &#8211; CA&#8217;s completely broken by Daniel Brandt</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2014/01/14/wow-what-a-certificate-verified-cm-cas-completely-broken/#comment-229595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Brandt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/?p=515#comment-229595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For information on CloudFlare certs issued by GlobalSign, check out this page:
www.cloudflare-watch.org/cfssl.html

We just scanned port 443 on 400,000 domains that use CloudFlare&#039;s name servers, and collected the Subject Alt Names on all the certs that came back. That gave us about 22,200 Alt Names (not counting the subdomain wildcard listings, which would double that number) on 1,818 certificates. Their Alt Names bookkeeping is a little sloppy (there is old data in many of them), but these are valid certs from GlobalSign. It&#039;s their way of making money off of the cloud-computing fad. Whether it&#039;s the right thing for a certificate authority to do is another question. (Incapsula also uses GlobalSign to do the same thing.)

Having said that, at least GlobalSign did the right thing when I complained to them that CloudFlare was supporting the Target heist by providing services to four sites that are marketing the stolen cerdit card data. GlobalSign pulled the certs on those four sites. CloudFlare, meanwhile, is still doing it via http, even though the https doesn&#039;t work. For that story, see www.cloudflare-watch.com/target.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For information on CloudFlare certs issued by GlobalSign, check out this page:<br />
<a href="http://www.cloudflare-watch.org/cfssl.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cloudflare-watch.org/cfssl.html</a></p>
<p>We just scanned port 443 on 400,000 domains that use CloudFlare&#8217;s name servers, and collected the Subject Alt Names on all the certs that came back. That gave us about 22,200 Alt Names (not counting the subdomain wildcard listings, which would double that number) on 1,818 certificates. Their Alt Names bookkeeping is a little sloppy (there is old data in many of them), but these are valid certs from GlobalSign. It&#8217;s their way of making money off of the cloud-computing fad. Whether it&#8217;s the right thing for a certificate authority to do is another question. (Incapsula also uses GlobalSign to do the same thing.)</p>
<p>Having said that, at least GlobalSign did the right thing when I complained to them that CloudFlare was supporting the Target heist by providing services to four sites that are marketing the stolen cerdit card data. GlobalSign pulled the certs on those four sites. CloudFlare, meanwhile, is still doing it via http, even though the https doesn&#8217;t work. For that story, see <a href="http://www.cloudflare-watch.com/target.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cloudflare-watch.com/target.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mobile browsers user interface vs. security by abaumhof</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2011/06/08/mobile-browsers-user-interface-vs-security/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[abaumhof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 03:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/?p=329#comment-109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hat tip from Nick: As the SSL certificate itself is correct, the current theory is that facebook doesn&#039;t provide all intermediate certificate authorities as part of the SSL handshake. If they are not in the system (which they are not for Apple Mac&#039;s, so most likely they are not for iOS as well), the system tried to retrieves them from the internet. As the requests have been done over 3G in the train, these requests might have timed out, producing this error message.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hat tip from Nick: As the SSL certificate itself is correct, the current theory is that facebook doesn&#8217;t provide all intermediate certificate authorities as part of the SSL handshake. If they are not in the system (which they are not for Apple Mac&#8217;s, so most likely they are not for iOS as well), the system tried to retrieves them from the internet. As the requests have been done over 3G in the train, these requests might have timed out, producing this error message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carberp – a new Trojan in the making by Carberp Trojan &#8211; New Virus, Malware Targets Banks, Finance Frauds</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/06/carberp-%e2%80%93-a-new-trojan-in-the-making/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carberp Trojan &#8211; New Virus, Malware Targets Banks, Finance Frauds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=268#comment-92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Andreas Baumhof, co-founder and chief technology officer of secure banking authentication firm TrustDefender. He said the Trojan is as yet unknown to the big antivirus [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andreas Baumhof, co-founder and chief technology officer of secure banking authentication firm TrustDefender. He said the Trojan is as yet unknown to the big antivirus [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carberp – a new Trojan in the making by Carberp: Quietly replacing Zeus as the financial malware of choice &#124; IT Security &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/06/carberp-%e2%80%93-a-new-trojan-in-the-making/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carberp: Quietly replacing Zeus as the financial malware of choice &#124; IT Security &#124; TechRepublic.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=268#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I would be remiss if I did not give credit to TrustDefender.com for their comprehensive report about Carberp. [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would be remiss if I did not give credit to TrustDefender.com for their comprehensive report about Carberp. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick update to Carberp by Carberp: Quietly replacing Zeus as the financial malware of choice &#124; IT Security &#124; TechRepublic.com</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/07/quick-update-to-carberp/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carberp: Quietly replacing Zeus as the financial malware of choice &#124; IT Security &#124; TechRepublic.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=288#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] malware&#8217;s targeted attacks are only successful against Internet Explorer and FireFox. Chrome so far is impervious to targeted attack, because Carberp uses web-browser [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] malware&#8217;s targeted attacks are only successful against Internet Explorer and FireFox. Chrome so far is impervious to targeted attack, because Carberp uses web-browser [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carberp – a new Trojan in the making by CARBERP Trojan Steals Information</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/06/carberp-%e2%80%93-a-new-trojan-in-the-making/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CARBERP Trojan Steals Information]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=268#comment-83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] spyware silently but successfully entered the cybercrime scene. CARBERP, as indicated in initial reports, is a new Trojan family that might have been created to challenge the already dominant [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spyware silently but successfully entered the cybercrime scene. CARBERP, as indicated in initial reports, is a new Trojan family that might have been created to challenge the already dominant [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carberp – a new Trojan in the making by CARBERP Trojan Steals Information &#124; Loan ToolZ</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/06/carberp-%e2%80%93-a-new-trojan-in-the-making/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CARBERP Trojan Steals Information &#124; Loan ToolZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 23:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=268#comment-82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] spyware silently but successfully entered the cybercrime scene. CARBERP, as indicated in initial reports, is a new Trojan family that might have been created to challenge the already dominant [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] spyware silently but successfully entered the cybercrime scene. CARBERP, as indicated in initial reports, is a new Trojan family that might have been created to challenge the already dominant [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carberp – a new Trojan in the making by Nuevo conjunto de amenazas destrona a Zeus - Foro Spyware</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/06/carberp-%e2%80%93-a-new-trojan-in-the-making/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuevo conjunto de amenazas destrona a Zeus - Foro Spyware]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=268#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carberp – a new Trojan in the making by Nuevo conjunto de amenazas destrona a Zeus - Foro Windows</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/06/carberp-%e2%80%93-a-new-trojan-in-the-making/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nuevo conjunto de amenazas destrona a Zeus - Foro Windows]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=268#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Quick update to Carberp by Carberp Trojan Next Zeus? &#171; MadMark&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tidos-group.com/blog/2010/10/07/quick-update-to-carberp/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carberp Trojan Next Zeus? &#171; MadMark&#039;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trustdefender.com/blog/?p=288#comment-104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] TrustDefender [...] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TrustDefender [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
